Rationalizing mineral gypsum use through microbially enriched municipal solid waste compost for amelioration and regaining productivity potential of degraded alkali soils

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 11816 (2023) Cite this article

159 Accesses

Metrics details

Reclamation of alkali soils to harness their productivity potential is more complex due to the presence of excess sodium ions, poor hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rate, resulting in poor plant growth and crop productivity. Sodic soil reclamation using inorganic ameliorants like mineral gypsum or phosphogypsum is beyond the reach of small and marginal farmers having alkali soils because of their higher market prices and shortage of availability. Conjoint use of inorganic and organic amendments can be a pragmatic solution for improving soil physico-chemical and biological properties and sustaining crop productivity. Municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) available in abundant quantity if enriched with the efficient halophilic microbial consortium and used in conjunction with a reduced dose of gypsum can be a cost-effective approach for sustainable reclamation of alkali soils and harnessing their productivity potential. Hence, a field experiment was conducted on a high alkali soil (pH2 9.2 ± 0.10), electrical conductivity (EC) 1.14 ±  0.12 dS m−1, exchangeable sodium percentage 48 ± 2.50 and organic carbon (0.30%) was conducted during 2018–19 to 2020–21 to study the combined effect inorganic and organic (enriched municipal solid waste compost (EMSWC)) amendments on amelioration of alkali soils and sustaining productivity of rice–wheat cropping system. Application of gypsum @ 25% GR + enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1 (T6) showed significant improvement in soil physico-chemical and biological properties over the sole application of organic (T3 and T4), inorganic (T2) and control (T1). A significant improvement in soil fertility status in terms of available nitrogen and micronutrients as well as CO3, HCO3, Cl, Ca and Mg content were recorded with the combined application of organic and inorganic soil amendments (T5 and T6) over the sole application of mineral gypsum. Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), nitrogen (MBN) and phosphorus (MBP) improved significantly due to the application of EMSWC with gypsum over the application of gypsum only. Grain yield of rice and wheat increased significantly (P < 0.05) owing to the application of a reduced dose of gypsum (25% GR) and EMSWC @ 10 t ha−1 (T6) with values of 5.55 and 3.83 t ha−1, respectively over rest of the treatments. Three years economic analysis of the study revealed that treatments T6 and T5 gave the highest positive net return whereas it was lowest in treatment T1 and negative in treatment T2. The highest benefit-to-cost ratio (B:C) was obtained in treatments T6 and T5 which were significantly higher compared to the rest of the treatments.

In arid and semi-arid regions, salt accumulation in soils is a major factor in land degradation and reducing crop productivity1. Nearly 1000 million hectares of soil is having some degree of salinization or sodification problem around the world2. Most of these soils are having poor plant growth and nutrient availability due to ion toxicity and ionic imbalance, low osmotic potential, moisture in the rhizosphere, extremely poor water conductivity and low available moisture range for plants3. The presence of salt load in such soils also diminishes microbial activities as well as microbial biomass4,5. In India about 6.73 million ha is salt-affected land including salinity [dominant in chloride and sulfates of Na, Ca, and Mg, pH < 8.5; electrical conductivity (EC) > 4 dS m−1; sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) > 15], of which about 3.77 million ha are reported as alkali soil [dominant in carbonate, bicarbonate, and silicates of Na, pH > 8.5; exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) > 15 and EC < 4 dS m−1]6. The amelioration of alkali lands and harnessing their productivity potential is of great importance. Gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) is generally used as a chemical ameliorant for the reclamation of these soils. Various studies have reported that there is no improvement in soil physical and biological properties with the use of chemical amendments only because of low hydraulic conductivity7 and also its reduced availability in the present scenario due to its non-agriculture uses and high reclamation cost, restricts chemical reclamation. Some studies have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of organic amendments, like farm yard manure (FYM) and press mud (a by-product of sugar mills) alone and in conjunction with chemical amendments for the amelioration of alkali soils and found a significant improvement in their physical, chemical and biological properties and crop productivity8,9.

Disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated as a by-product of industries, mining, municipality and agricultural processes is a major challenge in urban areas. About 1300 million tons of MSW are generated every year globally. By 2025, it is expected to reach to 2200 million tons annually10. Its disposal for land-filling contributes to polluting groundwater, breeding of insects and spreading of diseases. In India, about 62 million tons of MSW are generated per day11. The disposal of ever-increasing amounts of MSW is becoming a serious problem all over the world. Several strategies have been made for its effective utilization but its efficacy in the reclamation of alkali soils has not been scientifically explored. Composting of degradable MSWand its use as a source of organic matter is the simplest and best option for its management. Municipal solid waste compost (MSWC), having high organic matter content and low concentration of organic and inorganic pollutants helps in improving the physical, chemical, biochemical and microbial properties of salt-affected soils12. Application of MSWC could hasten salt leaching, reduces exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and electrical conductivity (EC), and increases infiltration, water holding capacity (WHC) and aggregate stability13. Furthermore, MSWC acts as a source of nutrients that can raise soil fertility and aid in maximising the productivity of salt-affected soils14,15. MSWC may act as a non-conventional carbon and nutrient source to reduce the adverse effects of alkalinity on soil properties. MSWC produced by waste treatment plants through the mechanical process are generally poor in plant nutrients therefore its adequacy in agricultural use has been reported as poor16. The halophilic plant growth-promoting microbes (HPGPM) have prospective for bio-amelioration of salt-affected soils17 by enhancing productivity and these require a suitable carrier for field application. Thus, enrichment of mechanically processed MSWC with HPGPM will help in improving the quality of compost. Given the nutritional importance and quality of the compost, the present study was therefore conducted to enrich the MSWC with halophilic plant growth-promoting microbes and its utilization in conjunction with inorganic amendments to ameliorate alkali soils and regaining the productivity potential of alkali soils under rice–wheat cropping system.

Field experiments were conducted at ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Research Farm, Lucknow, India located at 26° 47′ 58″ N latitude and 80° 46′ 24″ E longitude and 120 m above mean sea level (AMSL). Taxonomically the experimental soil of the farm was classified as Typic Natrustalfs, sandy loam to clay loam in texture18. The soil was poor in physical properties and nutrient status because of poor soil water and soil air relations caused by higher bulk density (> 1.6 g cm−3) and poor hydraulic conductivity. The farm land is gently sloping in NE to 97.6 m in the SW direction within contours of 99.0 m.

The climate of the experimental site is semi-arid, subtropical and monsoonal with an annual average rainfall of 817 mm. The maximum rainfall received in between 23 and 40 standard weeks (June–October) was 394 mm, which is 91% of the total annual rainfall. The remaining 9% was received between 41 and 22 standard weeks (November–May). The annual average evaporation rate (1580 mm) varies with increasing air temperature and atmospheric water demands increased gradually from 1 to 22 weeks (January–June). During the rainy season (June–October) evaporation rate gradually decreases following monsoonal rains. Further, it decreased gradually in the month of December due to reduced temperature. During the rainy season (June–September), the farm land remains in water surplus and in the remaining period (November–May) there is water deficit due to less precipitation and a higher evaporation rate. The mean maximum temperature (39 °C) was recorded in June and mean minimum temperatures (7.1 °C) in January. The mean annual temperature during the study period was recorded as 24.6 °C (Fig. 1).

Climatic features of the experimental site. The given figures are the average of 10 years of weather data (2010–2020).

The soil samples were collected from the experimental site at a soil depth of 0–15 cm with an auger. A part of the sample was air dried, grounded in a pestle and mortar passed through a 2.0 mm sieve and the other part was kept in the refrigerator for microbial and bio-chemical analysis. The processed samples were analysed for physico-chemical and biological properties. The different fractions of soil viz. sand, silt and clay contents were determined following International Pipette Method19. For bulk density determination, soil was extracted with an intact core sampler of 10 cm in diameter and 15 cm in length20, the infiltration rate in soil was estimated using double concentric infiltrometer cylinders of 60 cm outer and 30 cm inner diameters, and the soil porosity was calculated as (1 − Bulk Density/Particle Density) × 10021. For the determination of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil sample, the ammonium acetate-sodium acetate substitution method was employed21. The soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined in 1:2 soil:water solution using a glass-electrode digital pH meter (Systronics Type 361) and TDS-conductivity meter (Systronics Type 306), respectively. Exchangeable sodium concentration (cmol kg−1)/cation exchange capacity (cmol kg−1) × 100 was used for computing the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) of the soil. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content was analyzed by Walkley and Black’s rapid titration wet-oxidation method22. Available N, P and K content in processed soil samples was estimated by distillation with KMnO4 and NaOH23, sodium bicarbonate extraction method24 and sodium acetate extraction method25, respectively. The ionic concentration of Na and K in soil saturation extract were measured using Flame Photometry (Systronics, Type 128), while Ca and Mg ions by the Versenate titration method26. However, the carbonate (CO3−) and bi-carbonate (HCO3−) ion concentration were determined by titration with 0.01 N H2SO4 using phenolphthalein and methyl orange indicators. To optimize the gypsum dose for the experimental field soil, the mineral gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) requirement (GR) was determined using the modified method as described by Schoonover27. To analyse the biological properties of the soil, the usual serial dilution plate count method was used on nutrient agar, potato dextrose agar, and actinomycetes-specific media, for enumerating the respective bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes populations28, respectively. To analyse the soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) content, CHCl3 fumigation extraction technique29 was used. The soil microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) was measured by the chloroform fumigation extraction method30. Soil biochemical properties including urease and dehydrogenase activities were determined using phosphate buffer and urea substrate31 and triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method32. The initial properties of the experimental soil are presented in Table 1.

To quantify the dose of mineral gypsum to be applied in each treatment, its chemical composition was analysed using standard procedures. The mineral gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) constituted 18.3% Ca and 16.1% sulphur. The calculated amount of gypsum was broadcasted as per treatment during the month of June in the upper surface soil layer (up to 10–12 cm depth) and mixed with a power tiller (Fig. 2). About 10 cm of water was ponded for at least 10 days to displace the NaSO4 as the reaction product of Ca–Na exchange beyond the root zone as per the standard sodic soil reclamation protocol. As per treatment, organic sources of amendments like un-enriched MSW compost and enriched MSW compost were applied @ 10 t ha−1 and mixed in 15 cm of surface soil. The approach adapted for on-farm composting of MSW and its utilization for crop production in sodic soils to rationalize gypsum amendment is presented in Fig. 3.

Layout plan and imposition of treatments in the experimental field.

The approach adapted for on-farm composting of MSW and its utilization for crop production in sodic soils to rationalize gypsum amendment.

A field experiment on sodic soil was conducted constituting six treatments viz. T1—control (no soil amendment), T2—gypsum @ 50% GR, T3—un-enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1, T4—enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1, T5—gypsum @ 25% GR + un-enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1, T6—gypsum @ 25% GR + enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1 during 2018–19 to 2020–21 with rice-wheat crops in a Randomized block design and the treatments replicated four times. The reclamation protocol including field bunding, levelling, gypsum application, and leaching of salts was strictly followed before the application of organic amendments in the treatments.

Salt-tolerant varieties of rice ‘CSR36’ and wheat ‘KRL210’ were grown for three years as a test crop in the rainy and winter seasons, respectively. The recommended dose of fertilizers (150 kg N:60 kg P2O5:40 kg K2O:25 kg ZnSO4 ha−1) was applied uniformly in both the crops through urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), muriate of potash (MOP) and zinc sulphate. Half the quantity of nitrogenous fertilizer and a full dose of phosphorus, potash, and zinc were applied as basal uniformly in all the treatments. The remaining 50% of N fertilizer was applied in two equal splits at 30 days after transplanting (DAT) of rice and sowing of wheat and at panicle initiation stages in both crops. Rice seedlings of salt tolerant variety ‘CSR 36’ was transplanted at 20 × 15 cm row-to-row and plant-to-plant spacing in the second week of July and harvested in the first week of November. A salt-tolerant variety of wheat ‘KRL 210’ was sown after harvesting of rice in the month of November in the same treatments and harvested in April. Other crop management practices as and when required were remain the same in all the treatments. Grain and straw yields of both crops were calculated after harvesting from each net plot area (8 m × 7 m) and expressed in t ha−1.

The tube well used for irrigation of the experimental field was situated about 100 m away from the experimental field. Before using this water for irrigation its quality was analysed in the laboratory following standard methods. It has low electrolyte concentration and the corresponding EC values ranged between 0.78 and 0.90 dS m−1. Among the cations, Na dominates over Ca and Mg followed by K and the anions like, bicarbonates plus carbonates dominates over calcium, while sulphates were absent. This water was having residual alkalinity to the tune of 1.3–1.5 meq l−1 which was harmless for irrigating the crops grown in salt-affected soils.

The MSW compost for this study collected from nearby municipal solid waste treatment plant was enriched with consortia of efficient halophilic plant growth-promoting microbes that includes Azotobacter, Phosphobacteria and zinc solubilizing Bacillus sp. bacteria. The microbially enriched MSW compost was prepared as Compost enricher blocks for easy transportation and adoption by farmers for field application. It was analyzed for bio-chemical and microbiological properties after stabilization. The bio-chemical composition of the enriched and unenriched MSW compost is given in Table 2.

Soil samples collected from 0 to 15 cm soil depth from all the treatment plots, after three years of the experiment. Samples were air dried in shade, grounded through wooden pestle and sieved through 2 mm sieve for the analysis of chemical properties following the methods used to analyse initial soil properties. Part of the soil samples (about 100 g) was stored in refrigerator at 4 °C in polyethene bags for the analysis of soil biological properties.

The generated data was analysed statistically employing MSTAT-C version 2.1. To test the significance (p < 0.05) of treatment effect, the least significant difference (LSD) test at 5% significance level33 probability was used. The analysed data are presented as an average value of four replications with standard error (±).

Bio-chemical configuration of the enriched and un-enriched MSW compost is given in Table 2. Most of the bio-physical and chemical properties of the compost improved after enrichment with microbial formulations. The bulk density and moisture content after enrichment increased to the level of 14.10 and 20.48%, respectively. The data revealed that there was slight increase in pH and EC of the compost, but not much variation was observed in cation exchange capacity (CEC) between enriched and un-enriched composts. A significant reduction in C/N ratio (54.32%) was observed after enrichment of MSW compost. Nutrient status including total P, K, Ca, Mg and Zn increased substantially with the enrichment of MSW compost. The population of bacterial, fungal and phosphate solubilizing bacteria increased remarkably with the enrichment of MSW compost. The heavy metal contents decreased with microbial enriched compost.

The data given in Table 3 showed that the soil bulk density at surface (0–15 cm) and sub-surface (15–30 cm) layer reduced significantly when organic amendments were applied in combination with inorganic amendments over the control (T1) and application of only inorganic amendment (T2). Maximum drop in bulk density value was noticed in treatment T6 where EMSWC and reduced dose of gypsum (25% GR) was applied combinedly. Minimum bulk density was observed in control (T1) and T2 treatment (Table 3). Treatment T6 (Gypsum @ 25% GR + EMSWC @ 10 t ha−1) also exerted significant improvement in hydraulic conductivity with a value of 0.077 cm h−1 over treatment T1 (0.046 cm h−1) and T2 (0.055 cm h−1). This was closely followed by T4 (Enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1) and T5 (Gypsum @ 25% GR + un-enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1). The infiltration rate increased by 224, 89 and 356% with the application of EMSWC (T6) over T1, T2 and initial values, respectively (Table 3).

Soil analysis data presented in Table 4 demonstrated that the use of EMSWC along with a lower dose of gypsum decreased soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) while increasing soil organic carbon (SOC). The combined use of reduced gypsum and EMSWC (T6) recorded significant reduction in soil pH with a value of 8.5 over the treatment T1, T3, and T4 but at par with T2, and T5. Similarly, EC and ESP with values of 0.47 dS m−1 and 35 reduced significantly with treatment T6over the treatment T1, T3, and T4 and at par with T2, and T5. Reduced quantity of gypsum along with either un-enriched or enriched MSW compost improved SOC content in alkali soils as compared to only use of gypsum. Maximum improvement in SOC with a value of 3.90 g kg−1 was recorded in treatment T6 which was significantly higher over rest of the treatments and showed 25.80, 21.87, 21.87, 14.70 and 5.40% over T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Available N content under different treatments varies from 123.5 to 155.2 kg ha−1. The effect of EMSWC on available N content is shown in Table 4. The highest improvement in available N (155.2 kg ha−1) was recorded in treatment T6 which was significantly higher over rest of the treatments. The treatments in which EMSWC and gypsum were used in combined mode reported higher available P content than the application of gypsum alone. Plots treated with reduced dose of gypsum and EMSWC (25%G.R. + EMSWC) resulted 43 and 36% increase in available P over control (T1) and 50% G.R. (T2), respectively. Similarly, available K increased by 33 and 14% in treatment T6 over T1 and T2, respectively. Data given in Table 4 revealed more increment in Mg2+ and K+ contents in the soil extract in treatment T6 than rest of the treatments whereas, maximum reduction in Na+ and increment in Ca2+ were recorded in treatment T2.

The data furnished in Table 5 showed that the microbial population swelled with the application of organic amendments. The population of bacteria and fungi increased remarkably in soils where mineral gypsum and EMSW compost were used in a conjoint mode and the salt tolerant varieties of rice–wheat were grown. The highest bacterial population (8.46 × 104 cfu g−1) was enumerated in treatment T6 (gypsum @ 25% GR + EMSWC @ 10 t ha−1) and it was followed by the treatment T5, T4 and T3 and the lowest in T1. Similar trend was observed in case of fungal population. Application of enriched MSW compost as organic amendment along with mineral gypsum increased fungal population about 98% over the only application of gypsum (Table 5). Similarly, actinomycetes’s population increased significantly with the conjoined use of enriched MSW compost and rational dose of gypsum. However, microbial populations were unstable during the cropping season. The highest content of microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass N (MBN) and microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) were observed in soil from treatment T6 followed by T5, and T4. In our study urease and dehydrogenase activities in the soil enhanced significantly over the control, sole use of inorganic amendments and initial values in all of the treatments that combined the application of organic and inorganic amendments. Maximum increase in these parameters was observed in treatment T6 (Table 5).

After three years of field experiments with rice–wheat cropping system, heavy metal contents like Co, Cr and Pb and micronutrients like Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn in the soil were analyzed. The analysed data given in Table 6, showed that the concentration of Co and Cr declined in treatments where both organic and inorganic amendments were applied whereas, a marginal increase in Pb content was observed over the initial value but it was considerably below the permissible limit34,35. The micronutrient contents like Cu, Fe, and Zn increased over the initial value in soil representing treatments where combined use of organic and inorganic amends was made. Highest increase in iron (Fe) content was resulted in treatment T4 where industrial processed MSW compost was applied in conjunction with mineral gypsum.

Plant height of rice and wheat crop was non-significantly affected due to either sole application of inorganic or combined use of organic and inorganic amendments but it was greatest (124.0 cm and 83.55 cm) in treatment T2 and T6, respectively. Number of productive tillers per rice hill, which is a major yield contributing character and is precisely related to panicle density and grain yield influenced by the application of EMSWC with gypsum. Number of productive tillers hill−1 recorded with treatment T6 were significantly higher over treatment T1, T3 and T4 but statistically at par with T5 and T6. Similar pattern was observed in panicle density, panicle length and dry matter content of rice and wheat. Whereas, highest spikelet fertility was recorded in treatment T2 which was significantly higher over T1, T3 and T4 but at par with T5 and T6. Numbers of grains per panicle were also significantly higher in treatment T6 but it was at par with T5. Although 1000 grain weight was maximum in treatment T2 but there was no significant difference in this parameter between the treatments. Highest rice grain yield was observed in treatment T6 that was at par with T2 and T5 but significantly better than T1, T3 and T4 (Table 7).

Yield attributing characters like spike length, grains per spike, and 1000-grain weight of wheat were significantly higher in treatment T6 compared to the treatment T1, T3, and T4 but statistically at par with the treatments T2 and T5. Grain yield of wheat in treatment T6 was 110.75% and 20.61% higher over treatment T1 and T2, respectively (Table 8). Enrichment of MSW compost with microbes enhanced 21.36% wheat grain yield over un-enriched MSW compost used along with the mineral gypsum (Table 8).

During first year of reclamation, a small positive net return was computed in treatments T3 and T4 where only organic amendments were used, whereas, it was negative in the rest of the treatments. In treatment T2, highest negative net return was obtained that was followed by treatment T5 and T6. This was obviously due to higher cost involved in soil reclamation with gypsum applied @ 50% GR and 25% GR, respectively. However, during second year, when no amendment was applied and the crop productivity under treatment T6 and T5 was comparatively higher, the highest positive net return was obtained under treatment T6 followed by T5 and the lowest in treatment T1, while, negative return was still there in treatment T2. This demonstrates that even after the second year of cultivation, the expense of reclamation with the addition of gypsum is not recouped (Fig. 4). According to cost-economic analysis, treatment T6 had the greatest B/C ratio, which was comparable to treatment T5 but much higher than the other treatments.

Cumulative net returns of rice–wheat cropping system over two-years and a combined use of inorganic amendments and EMSWC. T1—control (no amendments), T2—gypsum @ 50% G.R., T3—un-enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1, T4—enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1, T5—gypsum @ 25% G.R. + un-enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1, T6—gypsum @ 25% G.R. + enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1.

After analysis of enriched and un-enriched MSW compost, it was observed the total nitrogen content in enriched MSW compost in comparison to un-enriched MSW compost increased, while total carbon content decreased. This may be due to considerable reduction in weight during decomposition of organic matter particularly of total C through C loss in respiration as CO2 after enrichment with microbial formulations as compared to loss in total N content in the un-enriched compost. Similar finding related to increased total N and decrease in total C content per unit of material during decomposition of different organic wastes were given by previous researchers36,37. Singh and Kalamdhad38 has also reported a reduction in heavy metal content by microbial inoculants because of enhancing enzymatic activities during composting process. The microorganisms are able to absorb, detoxification and transformation of heavy metals that resulted to immobilize metals in the solid wastes39,40.

The present study was undertaken with the aim to evaluate the potential of microbial enriched municipal solid waste compost for amelioration of alkali soils and monitor its effect on rice–wheat crop productivity. Sole application of gypsum, while being successful in significantly improving soil chemical properties, does not have much effect on soil physical and biological properties. Inability of gypsum to improve soil physical and biological properties has been earlier reported by several workers41,42,43. Application of Gypsum @ 25% GR + EMSWC @ 10 t ha−1 (T6) also exerted significant improvement in hydraulic conductivity with a value of 0.077 cm h−1 over control (T1) and application of gypsum treatment @ 50% G.R. (T2) with the values of 0.046 cm h−1 and 0.055 cm h−1, respectively. This was closely followed in treatment T4 and T5 in which only enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1 and combined use of gypsum @ 25% GR + un-enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1 were applied, respectively. Significant increase in infiltration rate in treatment T6 over T1, T2 and initial value may be because of improvement in pore geometry and transmission pores resulting from addition of organics44,45. Significant reduction in soil pH, EC, ESP and increased organic carbon content due to application of EMSWC composts in combination with reduced dose of gypsum (T6) over rest of the treatments may be attributed to increase in the organic carbon content, improved biological or enzymatic activities, producing more root biomass45,46,47,48 and higher evolution of CO2 and production of organic acids in soil which reduces the redox potential of soil thereby increasing the replacement of Na+ to Ca2+17,49,50,51,52. Significant improvement in SOC and ESP due to application of organic materials in salt affected soils has also been reported53. In our study, available N, P, and K content in soil from treatment T6 was significantly higher over rest of the treatments. This might be due to constant release of N from EMSW compost and creation of organic acids and mineralization products during decomposition which solubilizes the insoluble compounds that enhances the availability of P in soil51,54. Enhanced soil microbial and enzymatic activities vis-à-vis decomposition of organic matter resulted in mineralization of N and K in soil. Also, similar trend has been observed in case of Mg2+ and K+ contents whereas, maximum reduction in Na+ and increment in Ca2+ were recorded in treatment T2. This may be because of synergistic effect of gypsum and organic source of amendments48,55.

Remarkable increase in soil microbial population with combined application of mineral gypsum and EMSWC over the initial population and rest of the treatments was observed in the present study. This may be due to the improvement of soil microbial activities caused from substantially higher availability of substrate from the combined use of organic and inorganic amendments compared to application of only gypsum as soil amendment48,56,57. Similarly, fungal population increased with application of EMSWC in combination with gypsum increased to the tune of about 98% over the application of gypsum only. This showed that applying both organic and inorganic amendments together resulted in a greater improvement in soil microbial flora than sole application of inorganic amendments. According to Walmsley and Cerdà’s58, organic matter is the main influence on soil characteristics and the abundance of macrofauna in citrus plantation soils. The population of actinomycetes has also increased significantly when enriched MSW compost was applied in combination with lower dose of mineral gypsum. This is due to addition of organic sources of amendments. However, microbial populations were unstable during the cropping seasons.

Microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass N (MBN) and microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) in soil amended with EMSWC and reduced dose of gypsum (25% GR) (treatment T6) were higher due to enhanced soil mineralization as a result of increased soil microflora and associated with increase in CO2 release thereby resulting in soil aeration and stimulates enzymatic activities59. The huge increase in soil microbial activity caused by the addition of organic amendments in alkali soils is attributable to the large amounts of easily accessible energy sources60. Organic amendments augment the amount of substrate available to the microbial population and also reduce the impact that pH and osmotic pressure have on the organisms61. The addition of organic amendments to alkali soil improved soil fertility directly by increasing soil enzymes and their activity14. In the current study, urease activity substantially increased over the control and initial urease activity status in the soil in the treatments where organic amendments were added along with gypsum. Treatment T6 showed the greatest improvement in urease activities as a result of the addition of organic fractions, which may contain intracellular and extracellular enzymes that promote microbial activity in the soil62,63. In comparison to the control and the use of only inorganic amendments, soil dehydrogenase activities also increased after the addition of EMSWC with gypsum supplements and the cultivation of rice and wheat. The availability of high quantity of organic matter added to the soil that acts as substrate for the microorganisms, may be attributed to the increased microbial and enzymatic activities42,64.

Organic amendments application through EMSWC with lesser quantity of gypsum reduced the concentration of heavy metals like Co and Cr whereas, the Pb concentration increased over the initial content in soil but it was below the permissible limit35,65. The increase in Pb content was obtained in soil sample from the treatment where industrial processed MSW was added. This may be due to supplemented with industrial processed MSW compost procured from solid waste treatment plant. The status of micronutrient contents viz. Cu, Fe, and Zn increased with the combined usage of EMSWC and gypsum in alkali soils.

Three years average data revealed that addition of both organic and inorganic amendments had significant effect on growth and yield of rice as well as wheat crops. This is because of significant improvement in the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil after organic matter decomposition in EMSWC and subsequently increases organic acid exudates in the soil that mobilizes dissolution of soil calcium and reduces soil pH and ESP and increases soil organic carbon content66,67 resulting in increased plant growth. By enhancing the physical and chemical conditions of the rhizosphere, the addition of organic matter to the soil has been shown to have positive impacts on crop root growth68. This might be because organic amendments, which contain humic acid and other physiologically active compounds like amino acids, have improved biological activity in crop rhizosphere69. Yield and yield attributes in alkali soils are significantly affected because of restricted water movement, nutrient translocation, and toxic effect of sodium salt in the rhizosphere. However, addition of organic matter through EMSWC improved physico-chemical and biological properties of soil resulting in the improved crop growth, related yield attributes and crop yields68,70. The use of EMSWC aided in the drainage of surplus salts to a deeper layer, decreased the salt concentration in topsoil, which benefited plant growth, and ultimately boosted crop yields71,72.

Significant improvement in C:N ratio and microbial properties was observed after enrichment of MSW compost. Addition of enriched MSW compost @ 10 t ha−1 along with the reduced dose of gypsum showed significant effect on soil physico-chemical and microbial properties over the sole application of organic and inorganic amendments. The soil fertility status in terms of available N, P and K was favourably influenced with combined use of EMSWC and gypsum. Application of EMSWC significantly influenced the crop growth, yield attributes and yields. Maximum rice and wheat grain yields were recorded with conjunctive use of enriched MSW and gypsum that was significantly higher over the only use of either organic and inorganic amendments. The cost economic analysis of the study resulted the highest positive net return with treatment T6 whereas; negative net return was calculated with the application of inorganic amendment. This shows that reclamation cost with addition of gypsum @ 50% GR was not recovered even after second year of cultivation. The highest B/C ratio was also observed with combined use of EMSWC + gypsum @ 25% GR. Hence, it can be concluded from the study that the amelioration of alkali or sodic soil and crop yields were significantly influenced by the application of enriched MSW compost with inorganic amendment and the saved amount of mineral gypsum can be utilized for ameliorating double the salt affected area having such soil degradation problem.

The datasets of the raw data are available with the corresponding author and shall be made available on reasonable request.

Rengasamy, P. Salinity in the landscape: a growing problem in Australia. Geotimes 53, 34–39 (2008).

Google Scholar

FAO Land and plant nutrition management service. http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/spush (2008).

Marschner, P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (Academic Press, 2012).

Google Scholar

Chowdhury, N., Marschner, P. & Burns, R. G. Soil microbial activity and community composition: impact of changes in matric and osmotic potential. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 1229–1236 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yan, N. & Marschner, P. Microbial activity and biomass recover rapidly after leaching of saline soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 49, 367–371 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Mandal, A. K., Sharma, R. C. & Singh, G. Assessment of salt affected soils in India using GIS. Geo. Int. 24(6), 437–456 (2009).

Google Scholar

Hamza, M. A. & Anderson, W. K. Responses of soil properties and grain yields to deep ripping and gypsum application in a compacted loamy sand soil contrasted with a sandy clay loam soil in Western Australia. Austal. J. Agric. Res. 54, 273–282 (2003).

Article Google Scholar

Dhanushkodi, V. & Subrahmaniyan, K. Soil management to increase rice yield in salt affected coastal soil—a review. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. 2, 1–5 (2012).

Google Scholar

Singh, Y. P., Arora, S., Mishra, V. K., Dixit, H. & Gupta, R. K. Composting of municipal solid waste and farm wastes for its use as amendment in sodic soil. J. Soil Water Conserv. India 16(2), 172–177 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Hoornweg, D. & Bhada-Tata, P. What a waste: a global review of solid waste management, pp. 8, Urban Development and Local Government Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA (2012).

Reddy, D. R. Waste management in India—an overview. United Int. J. Res. Technol. 02(7), 175–196 (2021).

Google Scholar

Walter, I., Martinez, F. & Cuevas, G. Plant and soil responses to the application of composted MSW in a degraded, semiarid shrub land in central Spain. Compost Sci. Util. 14, 147–154 (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tejada, M. A. & Gonzalez, J. L. Crushed cotton gin compost on soil biological properties and rice yield. Eur. J. Agro. 25, 22–29 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Lakhdar, A. et al. Application of municipal solid waste compost reduces the negative effects of saline water in Hordeum maritime L.. Bio. Tech. 99, 7160–7167 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Singh, Y. P., Arora, S., Mishra, V. K., Dixit, H. & Gupta, R. K. Composting of municipal solid waste and farm wastes for its use as amendment in sodic soil. J. Soil Water Conserv. 16(2), 172–177 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Gaur, A. C. & Singh, G. Role of IPNS in sustainable and environmentally sound agricultural development in India. In PAO/RAPA Bulletin, 199–313 (1993).

Arora, S., Singh, Y. P., Vanza, M. & Sahni, D. Bioremediation of saline and sodic soils through halophilic bacteria to enhance agricultural production. J. Soil Water Conserv. India 15(4), 302–305 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Sharma, R. C., Singh, R., Singh, Y. P. & Singh, G. Sodic soils of Shivri Experimental Farm: Site characterization, reclaimability and use potential for different land uses. CSSRI, Technical Bulletin. 01/2006 (2006).

Day, P. R. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1 Agronomy, Q10 Monogr, vol *** 9 (ed. Black, C. A.) 545–567 (American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, 1965).

Google Scholar

Blake, G. R. & Hartge, K. H. Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Agronomy Monograph, vol **9 2nd edn (ed. Klute, A.) 363–382 (American Society of Agronomy-Soil, 1986).

Google Scholar

Jackson, M.L. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi (1973).

Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. An examination of Degtijareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Subbiah, B. V. & Asija, G. L. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci. 25, 259–263 (1956).

CAS Google Scholar

Olsen, S. R. & Dean, L. A. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 (ed. Black, C. A.) 1035–1049 (American Society of Agronomy, 1965).

Google Scholar

Hanway, J. J. & Heidel, H. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa state college soil testing laboratory. Iowa Agric. 54, 1–31 (1952).

Google Scholar

Chang, K. L. & Bray, R. H. Determination of calcium and magnesium in soil and plant material. Soil Sci. 72, 449–458 (1951).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Schoonover, W. R. Examination of Soils for Alkali (University of California, 1952).

Google Scholar

Dubey, R. C. & Maheshwari, D. K. Practical Microbiology 21–47 (S. Chand and Co., 2002).

Google Scholar

Brookes, P. C., Landman, A., Pruden, G. & Jenkinson, D. S. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 837–842 (1985).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Brookes, P. C., Powelson, D. S. & Jenkinson, D. S. Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 319–329 (1982).

Article CAS Google Scholar

May, P. B. & Douglas, L. A. Assay for soil urease activity. Plant Soil 45(1), 301–305 (1976).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Klein, D. A., Loh, T. C. & Goulding, R. L. A rapid procedure to evaluate dehydrogenase activity of soils low in organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 3, 385–387 (1971).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H. & Dicky, D. A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biological Approach 3rd edn. (McGraw Hill Book, 1997).

Google Scholar

Soltanpour, P. N. Use of ammonium bicarbonate DTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 16, 323–338 (1985).

Article CAS Google Scholar

MacLean, K. S., Robinson, A. R. & MacConnell, H. H. The effect of sewage-sludge on the heavy metal content of soils and plant tissue. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 18, 1303–1316 (1987).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Goyal, S., Dhull, S. K. & Kapoor, K. K. Chemical and biological changes during composting of different organic wastes and assessment of compost maturity. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 1584–1591 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bernal, M.P., Sanchez-Monedero, M.A., Paredes, C. & Roig, A. Carbon mineralization from organic wastes at different composting stages during their incubation with soil. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 69(3), 175–189 (1998).

Google Scholar

Singh, J. & Kalamdhad, A. S. Reduction of heavy metals during composting—a review. Int. J. Environ. Protect. 2(9), 36–43 (2012).

Google Scholar

Zeng, G. et al. Composting of lead-contaminated solid waste with inocula of white-rot fungus. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 320–326 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Shukla, O. P., Rai, U. N. & Dubey, S. Involvement and interaction of microbial communities in the transformation and stabilization of chromium during the composting of tannery effluent treated biomass of Vallisneria spiralis L.. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 2198–2203 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sahin, U., Anapali, O. & Hanay, A. The effect of consecutive applications of leaching water applied in equal, increasing or decreasing quantities on soil hydraulic conductivity of a saline sodic soil in the laboratory. Soil Use and Manag. 8, 152–154 (2002).

Google Scholar

Tejada, M., Garcia, C., Gonzalez, J. L. & Harnandez, M. T. Use of organic amendment as strategy for saline soil remediation: Influence on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 1413–1421 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Hussain, N., Hassan, G., Arshadullah, M. & Mujeeb, F. Evaluation of amendments for the improvement of physical properties of sodic soil. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 3, 319–322 (2012).

Google Scholar

Lakhdar, A. et al. Application of municipal solid waste compost reduces the negative effects of saline water in Hordeum maritime L.. Biores. Technol. 99(15), 7160–7167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.071 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Singh, Y. P., Arora, S., Mishra, V. K., Dixit, H. & Gupta, R. K. Conjoint use of chemical amendments and municipal solid waste compost for amelioration of degraded sodic soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 66(4), 392–398 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Bolan, N. S. et al. Dissolved organic matter: Biogeochemistry, dynamics, and environmental significance in soils. Adv. Agron. 110, 1–8 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Brar, B. S., Singh, K., Dheri, G. S. & Kumar, B. Carbon sequestration and soil carbon pools in a rice-wheat cropping system: Effect of long-term use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manure. Soil Tillage Res. 128, 30–36 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Singh, Y. P., Arora, S., Mishra, V. K., Dixit, H. & Gupta, R. K. Plant and soil responses to the combined application of organic amendments and inorganic fertilizers in degraded sodic soils of Indo-Gangetic plains. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 50(20), 2640–2654 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ansari, A. A. Soil profile studies during bioremediation of sodic soils through the application of organic amendments (Vermiwash, Tillage, Green Manure, Mulch, Earthworms and Vermicompost). World J. Agric. Sci. 4(5), 550–553 (2008).

Google Scholar

Abd Elrahman, S. H., Mostafa, M. A., Taha, T. A., Elsharawy, M. A. & Eid, M. A. Effect of different amendments on soil chemical characteristics, grain yield and elemental content of wheat plants grown on salt-affected soil irrigated with low quality water. Ann. Agric. Sci. 57(2), 175–182 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Rahman, B. & Nath, D. Nutritional status of organic amended soils of subtropical humid climate of Tripura. Int. J. Farm Sci. 3(1), 51–57 (2013).

Google Scholar

Diacono, M. & Montemurro, F. Effectiveness of organic waste as fertilizer and amendment in salt affected soils. Agriculture 5, 221–230 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Clark, G., Dodgshun, N., Sale, P. & Tang, C. Changes in chemical and biological properties of a sodic clay subsoil with addition of organic amendments. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39(11), 2806–2817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.003 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Weber, J. et al. Agricultural and ecological aspects of a sandy soil as affected by the application of municipal solid waste composts. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 1294–1302 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Srivastava, P. K. et al. Production and characterization of sustainable vermimanure derived from poultry litter and rice straw using tiger worm Eisenia fetida. Bioresour. Technol. 369, 128377 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Yazdanpanah, N. et al. Effect of some amendments on leachate properties of a calcareous saline-sodic soil. Int. Agrophys. 25(3), 307–310 (2011).

CAS Google Scholar

Mbarki, S. et al. Vineyard compost supplemented with Trichoderma harzianum T78 improves saline soil quality. Land Deg. Dev. 28(3), 1028–1037 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Walmsley, A. & Cerdà, A. Soil micro fauna and organic matter in irrigated orchards under Mediterranean climate. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 33, 1–11 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Muhammad, S., Muller, T. & Georg Joerjensen, R. Compost and P amendment for stimulating microorganisms and maize growth in a saline soil from Pakistan in comparison with a non-saline soil from Germany. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 170, 745–751 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Shen, Q., Wang, Y. W. & Chen Shi, R. Changes of soil microbial biomass carbon and phosphorus during wheat growth after application of fertilizers. Pedosphere 7, 225–230 (1997).

Google Scholar

Pathak, H. & Rao, D. L. N. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization from added organic matter in saline and alkali soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 695–702 (1998).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Singh, Y. P., Arora, S., Mishra, V. K. & Singh, A. Composting of municipal solid waste using earthworms and ligno-cellulolytic microbial consortia for reclamation of the degraded sodic soils and harnessing their productivity potential. Sustainability 15, 2317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032317 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Goyal, S., Mishra, M. M., Dhankar, S. S., Kapoor, K. K. & Batra, R. Microbial biomass turnover and enzyme activity following the application of farmyard manure to field soil with and without previous long-term application. Biol. Fertil. Soils 15, 60–64 (1993).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liang, Y., Nikolic, M., Peng, Y., Chen, W. & Jiang, Y. Organic manure stimulates biological activity and barley growth in soil subject to secondary salinization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37(1), 1185–1195 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Soltanpour, P. N. Use of ammonium bicarbonate DTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity 1. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 16, 323–338 (1985).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Van Asten, P. J. A., Van’tzelfde, J. A., Van der Zee, S. E. & Hammecker, C. The effect of irrigated rice cropping on the alkalinity of two alkaline rice soils in the Sahel. Geoderma 119(3–4), 233–247 (2004).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Singh, Y. P., Arora, S., Mishra, V. K. & Bharadwaj, A. K. Regaining the agricultural potential of sodic soils and improved smallholder food security through integration of gypsum, pressmud and salt tolerant varieties. Agroeco. Sust. Food Sysy. 46(3), 410–431 (2021).

Google Scholar

Sidiras, N., Bilalis, D. & Vavoulidou, E. Effect of tillage and fertilization on some selected physical properties of soils (0–30cm) depth and on the root growth dynamic of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Niki). J. Agronn. Crop Sci. 187, 167–176 (2002).

Article Google Scholar

Gondek, K. & Filipek-Mazur, B. The effect of mineral treatment and amendments by organic and organo mineral fertilizers on crop yield, plant nutrient status and soil properties. Plant Soil Environ. 54, 34–45 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Cha-um, S., Pokasombat, Y. & Kirdmanee, C. Remediation of salt-affected soil by gypsum and farmyard manure – Importance for the production of Jasmine rice. Aus. J. Crop Sci. 4, 458–465 (2011).

Google Scholar

Muhammad, D. & Khattak, R. A. Wheat yield and chemical composition as influenced by integrated use of gypsum, pressmud and FYM in saline sodic soil. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 33, 82–86 (2011).

CAS Google Scholar

Singh, Y. P., Mishra, V. K., Arora, S., Sharma, D. K. & Singh, S. Barren to bountiful: A successful livelihood security option for resource poor farmers. IRRI News 1, 25 (2015).

Google Scholar

Download references

Authors are thankful to the Director, U.P. Council of Science and Technology, Lucknow for the research project and the Director, ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute for providing necessary facilities in order to conduct field experiment at Research farm, Shivri and extending laboratory facilities for soil analysis. Authors are thankful to Dr. D.K. Srivastava, Joint Director, U.P. Council of Science and Technology, Lucknow for support in conducting the study. Authors also compliment Dr. Shyamji Mishra (Farm Manager), Mrs. Priya Mishra, Mr. Pulkit Srivastava, Ms. Mamta Prajapati (JRFs) and Mr. Somshekhar (PA) for providing necessary assistance during the study.

ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow, 226002, India

Yash Pal Singh, Sanjay Arora, Vinay Kumar Mishra & Atul Kumar Singh

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Conceptualized the project work, conducted experiment in the field, collected agronomical data, Y.P.S.; analysis of soilchemical properties, enrichment of municipal solid waste compost, S.A.; analysis of soil physical properties; V.K.M.; Analysis of soil microbial and enzymatic properties S.A.; Data analysis and preparing draft of manuscript, Y.P.S. and S.A.; reviewing and editing,S.A., Y.P.S., V.K.M. and A.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to publish the manuscript.

Correspondence to Sanjay Arora.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Singh, Y.P., Arora, S., Mishra, V.K. et al. Rationalizing mineral gypsum use through microbially enriched municipal solid waste compost for amelioration and regaining productivity potential of degraded alkali soils. Sci Rep 13, 11816 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37823-5

Download citation

Received: 02 January 2023

Accepted: 28 June 2023

Published: 21 July 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37823-5

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.